Originally posted by seven
Quddus;
Alright, I\'m going to give you the opportunity to explain to us, how you conclude the 360 gpu is slightly better than the RSX, while ignoring all available facts I just pointed out.
Let me restate though that current available evidence is not quite in your favour, unless you have a perfect explanation how a GPU with a much lower transistor budget whilst running at a lower clockspeed (360 GPU) is "slightly better" than the RSX.
PS: Not so sound rude or anything, but I take it you are aware what transistors are and their relevance to microchips, right?
I am aware of all are you? You\'re so bent on the ps3 being so powerful. Maybe the whole gpu thing just blows over head in any case I won\'t state the obvious for you.
It was Nividia who broke news on the gpu before $ony. But if you bothered to go indepth about xbox360 gpu then you would know what I am talking about.
Furthermore, I really don\'t care to discus it. PS3 is not this graphical beast that many thought it would be. So now they\'re trying to ease the pain by feeding into hype and untruths.
It\'s really sad. The samething happen when ps2 launched.
Hype..hype...hype....lies...lies....lies.
I don\'t expect huge graphics from 360 or ps3. And I expect to the same graphics on each console. The trick will be which console is easiest to program.
I have just went to the basement and broken out my dreamcast.
Call me when the console war is over.
Do me one better. When we finally get are toy story graphics.
I got my money on nintendo;)