Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: London hit by terrorist attack?  (Read 5576 times)

Offline Ace
  • Evil Klown
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2401
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.reprovideo.com
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #105 on: July 18, 2005, 04:17:38 AM »
Sorry guys. Been busy with work and other things. :)
www.lifesburning.com


There never has been a time when the power of America was so necessary or so misunderstood . . .
Tony Blair\'s Address to Congress

Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #106 on: July 18, 2005, 04:26:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip

Gaming is not important. I insult there. Others insult there. It\'s no big deal. This stuff is important.
[/b]

So you admit your hypocracy.  This is an internet forum - regardless of the topic.  In the grand scheme of things this forum isn\'t any more important than any other forum on this site.  As in your words - it is no big deal.  Others insult here and if one doesn\'t go overboard and attempts to continue the discussion in an intelligent manner it is not a big deal.


Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip

You\'re a blind racist, if you believe that.


I am a racist because I doubt there is a white middle class Islamic fundamentalist sleeper cell here in the US?  Honestly - how many white muslims do you know?  

Unlike the UK, our government doesn\'t tolerate hate filled clerics and usually keeps a close eye on them - which leads to them being either jailed or deported.  The government is also now keeping tabs on people who listen to these clerics and those that leave this country to go to the Middle East and come back.

A white person doing this would stick out like a sore thumb among the intelligence community.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2005, 04:34:49 AM by GigaShadow »
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #107 on: July 18, 2005, 04:32:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by cloud345
You dont think there are still christians in the world today that kill in the name of god? You just don\'t see it on the news.

I still don\'t think you relise how uneffective complete deportation of Muslims would be. It would not solve anything, it would most likely increase violence and hate against America. Please try and understand this.

Muslim extremist terrorist=Western culture haters.

M.E.T+Getting religion kicked out of America= W. culture hatersx10.


As I have said, just wait for some attack that makes 9/11 look like peanuts.  With our current weak border security, incompetant neighbors like Mexico and Canada along with the idiotic ACLU - it is inevitable.
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline cloud345
  • Super Bowl XXXVII
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2047
  • Karma: +10/-0
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #108 on: July 18, 2005, 10:27:58 AM »
To be honest the only Muslims I know are white or black.....
1.FF7
  2. Grandia
  3. MGS
Is it me? Or does PSone own all the other systems?

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #109 on: July 18, 2005, 05:07:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by cloud345
To be honest the only Muslims I know are white or black.....



It\'s impossible for a white to be a muslim, didn\'t you know that?

Offline hyper
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 461
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #110 on: July 18, 2005, 05:45:13 PM »
My God, Giga... let me sum up what you have said in this thread.

1) Your cry about wanting to protect innocent people. Yet you don\'t give a damn about innocent American Muslims who would be torn from family, lose their jobs, and very likely be put in mortal danger if they were to be deported. To you, a Muslim forfeited innocence the moment he chose Islam.  

2) You say Islam has no place in this country because of its radicalism. Yet you will allow Christian bigotry on the grounds that it does not inspire people to commit heinous acts, even though I have given you concrete examples of Christian extremists who are ready to kill and have killed.

3) You are ready to trample on the First Amendment and the rights of all Muslims because you believe that  being Muslim somehow entails sedition.

4) Lastly, you are well-informed. And because you are well-informed, you absolutely cannot deny the parallels between your philosophy and McCarthyism. Except in your case, people don\'t even have to be accused of being a red or against the government. All it takes is for them to be Muslim, and then it doesn\'t matter if they were born and raised in this country - they are guilty and CANNOT be proven innocent.

The Japanese concentration camps were labeled as inhumane, but only after the Japanese had already sufferred. McCarthyism was deemed as completely Un-American, but only after it ruined hundreds of innocent people. Funny thing is, people seem to ignore  lessons from history and only admit their mistakes after they are committed. Let\'s not continue that trend by even thinking about indiscriminately deporting all Muslims.

Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #111 on: July 18, 2005, 05:57:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
It\'s impossible for a white to be a muslim, didn\'t you know that?


Heh...without the smiley, I\'m not sure if you jest. But I just wanna remind you, in case you are serious, that Serbs are Muslims.
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #112 on: July 18, 2005, 06:14:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by hyper
My God, Giga... let me sum up what you have said in this thread.

1) Your cry about wanting to protect innocent people. Yet you don\'t give a damn about innocent American Muslims who would be torn from family, lose their jobs, and very likely be put in mortal danger if they were to be deported. To you, a Muslim forfeited innocence the moment he chose Islam.
[/b]

Sure I care about Muslims.  I care about them killing innocent people in the Western world.  I wonder would what you would be saying if this were say WW2?  Would you be defending the Germans and the Japanese?    

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
2) You say Islam has no place in this country because of its radicalism. Yet you will allow Christian bigotry on the grounds that it does not inspire people to commit heinous acts, even though I have given you concrete examples of Christian extremists who are ready to kill and have killed.
[/b]

You forget Christianity played a major role in the development of this country and you can not argue that even though we have seperation of Church and State, that the US is by and large a Christian nation.  For all practical purposes it is the native religion of this country.  Islam is not.  Please stop comparing the two.  As for these extremists - few and far between.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
3) You are ready to trample on the First Amendment and the rights of all Muslims because you believe that  being Muslim somehow entails sedition.


Correct!

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
4) Lastly, you are well-informed. And because you are well-informed, you absolutely cannot deny the parallels between your philosophy and McCarthyism. Except in your case, people don\'t even have to be accused of being a red or against the government. All it takes is for them to be Muslim, and then it doesn\'t matter if they were born and raised in this country - they are guilty and CANNOT be proven innocent.
[/b]

You speak as if McCarthyism was a bad thing.  Actually it did weed out a lot of Communists in the beginning, but then old Joe\'s alcoholism got the best of him.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
The Japanese concentration camps were labeled as inhumane, but only after the Japanese had already sufferred. McCarthyism was deemed as completely Un-American, but only after it ruined hundreds of innocent people. Funny thing is, people seem to ignore  lessons from history and only admit their mistakes after they are committed. Let\'s not continue that trend by even thinking about indiscriminately deporting all Muslims.


I can see the fire I am going to draw from my next statement...

I have no problems with what the US government did to the Japanese in this country after Pearl Harbor and for the remainder of WW2.  So quite a number were innocent - by rounding them all up our country could devote resources to the war instead of tryiing to find out who was a good Japanese as opposed to who was a bad one.  It certainly worked as there was no Japanese spying after the fact.  

Honestly, I am done with this worn out topic.  None of us know what will happen next, but I hope I don\'t have to say I told you so.  I also have to wonder about any white person that converts to a barbaric religion such as Islam... John Walker Lindh comes to mind...

A long time ago I felt sympathy for Muslims who were trying to get back Palestine and in other parts of the world.  That died on 9/11.
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #113 on: July 18, 2005, 06:15:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GmanJoe
Heh...without the smiley, I\'m not sure if you jest. But I just wanna remind you, in case you are serious, that Serbs are Muslims.


No Serbs aren\'t Muslim.  Muslims live in Bosnia and Kosavo.  The Serbs are Orthadox Christian.

/done.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2005, 06:18:07 PM by GigaShadow »
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #114 on: July 18, 2005, 07:23:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GmanJoe
Heh...without the smiley, I\'m not sure if you jest. But I just wanna remind you, in case you are serious, that Serbs are Muslims.


I forgot the sarcastic smiley.
According to the all-so-wise Giga, there are no "sleepers" and it just isn\'t possible for a white American to hate the country and be a terrorist or be a radical muslim. Then again, muslims are just so dangerous all around, we should deport them all to their own little island.

Offline JBean
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2535
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #115 on: July 19, 2005, 05:44:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow
I am a racist because I doubt there is a white middle class Islamic fundamentalist sleeper cell here in the US?  Honestly - how many white muslims do you know?  

A white person doing this would stick out like a sore thumb among the intelligence community. [/B]


Quote
In the United States, there are estimated to be roughly 80,000 white and Hispanic Muslims, along with a far greater number of African-American ones.


http://www.laweekly.com/ink/05/02/features-bernhard.php

just google "white muslim" if you don\'t think they exist.  This is only the first link of many I found.

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #116 on: July 19, 2005, 06:15:58 AM »
I\'m sure Giga will claim it\'s spin doctored hype or something outrageous.

Offline hyper
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 461
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #117 on: July 19, 2005, 06:18:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow


Sure I care about Muslims.  I care about them killing innocent people in the Western world.  I wonder would what you would be saying if this were say WW2?  Would you be defending the Germans and the Japanese?    


I love how you try to sidestep the issue of innocent Muslims. And yes, I would defend Germans and Japanese just as many Protestant denominations in the West Coast did during WWII. War does not turn my friends into spies overnight. Hopefully, the same goes for you.    

Quote

You forget Christianity played a major role in the development of this country and you can not argue that even though we have seperation of Church and State, that the US is by and large a Christian nation.  For all practical purposes it is the native religion of this country.  Islam is not.  Please stop comparing the two.  As for these extremists - few and far between.
[/B]


Stop trying to change the topic. I never commented on the separation of Church and State or the religious character of the United States. I will state my point again ?Christianity and Islam both have extremists. They are few and far between for both religions but equally dangerous. Clear?

Quote

Correct!
[/B]


Yes! I’m right about you!

Quote

You speak as if McCarthyism was a bad thing.  Actually it did weed out a lot of Communists in the beginning, but then old Joe\'s alcoholism got the best of him.
[/B]


Heh. The things you’ll do to prove your point.
 
Quote

I can see the fire I am going to draw from my next statement...

I have no problems with what the US government did to the Japanese in this country after Pearl Harbor and for the remainder of WW2.  So quite a number were innocent - by rounding them all up our country could devote resources to the war instead of tryiing to find out who was a good Japanese as opposed to who was a bad one.  It certainly worked as there was no Japanese spying after the fact.  
[/B]


Well, here comes the fire!

?B] A 1941 report prepared on President Roosevelt\'s orders by Curtis B. Munson, special representative of the State Department, concluded that most Japanese nationals and "90 to 98 percent" of Japanese American citizens were loyal.[/B] He wrote: "There is no Japanese `problem\' on the Coast ... There is far more danger from Communists and people of the Bridges type on the Coast than there is from Japanese."??Google the source if you’d like. I don’t have it, as it’s from a research paper I did for school.

“The most serious discrimination during World War II was the decision to evacuate Japanese nationals and American citizens of Japanese descent from the West Coast and send them to internment camps. Because the FBI had arrested the individuals whom it considered security threats, FBI Director Hoover took the position that confining others was unnecessary.?- http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fbi/fbi_hist.htm#world

“Most of the 110,000 persons removed for reasons of \'national security\' were school-age children, infants and young adults not yet of voting age.?- http://www.pbs.org/childofcamp/history/

“At the time, Executive Order 9066 was justified as a "military necessity" to protect against domestic espionage and sabotage. However, it was later documented that "our government had in its possession proof that not one Japanese American, citizen or not, had engaged in espionage, not one had committed any act of sabotage." (Michi Weglyn, 1976).

Rather, the causes for this unprecedented action in American history, according to the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, "were motivated largely by racial prejudice, wartime hysteria, and a failure of political leadership."
- http://www.pbs.org/childofcamp/history/

But all of that can be said do be subjective. Here’s the clincher:

“In early 1944, the government began clearing individuals to return to the West Coast; on January 2, 1945, the exclusion order was rescinded entirely. The fact that this occurred long before the Japanese surrender, while the war was arguably at its most vicious, weighs heavily against the claim that the relocation was an essential security measure.?
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_internment

Perhaps you’d like to explain again the logical soundness of internment? Maybe the government thought the horrendous conditions of the camps put the fear of God into the Japanese.

You disappoint me, Giga. If you were glad about how the Japanese were treated for the “remainder of WWII,?then you should also be against the deportation of Muslims. You know, since the Japanese, with their “spies?and all, were returned long before the war ended. Check on your facts next time before you speak; you clearly thought that they were interned for the entire war. Seems like war hysteria’s getting the better of you.    


Quote

Honestly, I am done with this worn out topic.  None of us know what will happen next, but I hope I don\'t have to say I told you so.  I also have to wonder about any white person that converts to a barbaric religion such as Islam... John Walker Lindh comes to mind...
[/B]


Yes, I’m getting tired of this topic as well. I’m sure the other members are also tired of my dragging this thread out. But when you supply me with bigoted statements like “barbaric religion such as Islam,?I become rejuvenated.

Quote

A long time ago I felt sympathy for Muslims who were trying to get back Palestine and in other parts of the world.  That died on 9/11. [/B]


Yes, and your ability to reason died with it.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2005, 08:26:35 AM by hyper »

Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #118 on: July 19, 2005, 09:00:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hyper
I love how you try to sidestep the issue of innocent Muslims. And yes, I would defend Germans and Japanese just as many Protestant denominations in the West Coast did during WWII. War does not turn my friends into spies overnight. Hopefully, the same goes for you.    



Just like those Muslim boys in the UK had friends who thought they were swell guys before they set off the bombs right?

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
Stop trying to change the topic. I never commented on the separation of Church and State or the religious character of the United States. I will state my point again – Christianity and Islam both have extremists. They are few and far between for both religions but equally dangerous. Clear?
[/B]

There are many more fanatical Muslims than there are Christian fundamentalists.  Like I said you can\'t stop comparing the two even though the fact that Islamic fundamentalists are responsible for killing hundreds of people a day.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper

Yes! I’m right about you!



And I am correct in my opinion of you.  Whoopy!

Quote
Originally posted by hyper

Heh. The things you’ll do to prove your point.
 


Glad to see you can\'t deny that the Red Menace was in fact real in the beginning.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper


A 1941 report prepared on President Roosevelt\'s orders by Curtis B. Munson, special representative of the State Department, concluded that most Japanese nationals and "90 to 98 percent" of Japanese American citizens were loyal.
He wrote: "There is no Japanese `problem\' on the Coast ... There is far more danger from Communists and people of the Bridges type on the Coast than there is from Japanese."’ – Google the source if you’d like. I don’t have it, as it’s from a research paper I did for school.


When was this concluded?  What year?  You forget the Japanese attacked us at Pearl Harbor and did use spies based in Hawaii.  You Google it - you are making the claim, not I.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper

“Because the FBI had arrested the individuals whom it considered security threats, FBI Director Hoover took the position that confining others was unnecessary.
” - http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fbi/fbi_hist.htm#world


I agree with the militaries assessment more than Queen Hoovers.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
"Most of the 110,000 persons removed for reasons of \'national security\' were school-age children, infants and young adults not yet of voting age.” - http://www.pbs.org/childofcamp/history/

“At the time, Executive Order 9066 was justified as a "military necessity" to protect against domestic espionage and sabotage. However, it was later documented that "our government had in its possession proof that not one Japanese American, citizen or not, had engaged in espionage, not one had committed any act of sabotage." (Michi Weglyn, 1976).


Of course there was no espionage - they were all in camps!  As for PBS the great liberal media outlet, it doesn\'t surprise me that they try and victimize the enemy in a revisionist form of reporting.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
Rather, the causes for this unprecedented action in American history, according to the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, "were motivated largely by racial prejudice, wartime hysteria, and a failure of political leadership."


See my above reference to PBS.

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
But all of that can be said do be subjective. Here’s the clincher:

“In early 1944, the government began clearing individuals to return to the West Coast; on January 2, 1945, the exclusion order was rescinded entirely. The fact that this occurred long before the Japanese surrender, while the war was arguably at its most vicious, weighs heavily against the claim that the relocation was an essential security measure.
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_internment


I wouldn\'t quote Wikipedia as it is written by fellow internet users.  That being said the point you are "clinching" your arguement on is faulty.  The War in the Pacific was over after the Battle of Midway.  The Japanese had no carrier\'s left and were no longer a threat offensively.  This all happened in June of 1942 - a good year and a half before 1944 and an even longer 2 and a half years before the order was rescinded.  

Quote
Originally posted by hyper
Perhaps you’d like to explain again the logical soundness of internment? Maybe the government thought the horrendous conditions of the camps put the fear of God into the Japanese.


You already pointed the logic out in your own post!  

Quote
Executive Order 9066 was justified as a "military necessity" to protect against domestic espionage and sabotage.



Quote
Originally posted by hyper
You disappoint me, Giga. If you were glad about how the Japanese were treated for the “remainder of WWII,” then you should also be against the deportation of Muslims. You know, since the Japanese, with their “spies” and all, were returned long before the war ended. Check on your facts next time before you speak; you clearly thought that they were interned for the entire war. Seems like war hysteria’s getting the better of you.


It is not I that need to check my facts friend, it is you.  My statement regarding the "remainder of WWII" was a generalization regarding timelines, but your claim that they were "returned long before the war ended is absurd!".  Japan formerly surrendered in August of the same year that the order was repealed.  

Also as I have pointed out the Battle of Midway effectively ended any Japanese threat to the US mainland in 1942.  Japan was fighting a losing battle from that point on and was being driven back across the Pacific.  It is only logical that they weren\'t deemed a threat given Japan\'s situation in the war.      


Quote
Originally posted by hyper
Yes, I’m getting tired of this topic as well. I’m sure the other members are also tired of my dragging this thread out. But when you supply me with bigoted statements like “barbaric religion such as Islam,” I become rejuvenated.


Likewise, with your revisionist thinking it beckons me to respond and sickens me that people like you think of our former enemies as victims as well as believing that during wartime the US shouldn\'t have taken any precautions.  The US was attacked without provocation and you expect the government not to take measures to ensure the safety of this country?  Let me ask do you believe we shouldn\'t have dropped the A-bombs on Japan?  Your answer could explain everything.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2005, 09:02:34 AM by GigaShadow »
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
London hit by terrorist attack?
« Reply #119 on: July 19, 2005, 09:03:13 AM »
All I have to say is, the thinking Giga has on Muslims is just as dangerous as any of the KKK. May as well join it.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk