Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.  (Read 40119 times)

Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #600 on: January 15, 2006, 07:05:37 PM »
I think they already said today that Alexander is going to play next week.
Helloski.

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #601 on: January 15, 2006, 07:06:27 PM »
In that case, goodbye Panthers.

P.S - John Fox and Jake are retards. Nothing new on that front.

;)

Offline videoholic

  • Silly little freak
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18034
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #602 on: January 15, 2006, 07:06:45 PM »
It\'s an underdog day....
I wear a necklace now because I like to know when I\'m upside down.
 kopking: \"i really think that i how that guy os on he weekend\"
TheOmen speaking of women: \"they\'re good at what they do, for what they are.\"
Swifdi:

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #603 on: January 15, 2006, 07:08:20 PM »
Not sure about that - I don\'t think anyone expected the Bears to win. I know for a fact no one expected the Bears to put up that amount of points.

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #604 on: January 15, 2006, 07:10:00 PM »
i thought it was a 50/50 game..wasnt going to be surprised whether the panthers or bears won.
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #605 on: January 15, 2006, 07:11:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
In that case, goodbye Panthers.

P.S - John Fox and Jake are retards. Nothing new on that front.

;)



They really were sore winners if that can be said...


But what can I say? They won the game, congrats to \'em.


Trust me, come next year Urlacher and Tommie Harris are going to remember all the chest thumping they did at the end of the game.
Helloski.

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #606 on: January 15, 2006, 07:48:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Luke
They really were sore winners if that can be said...


But what can I say? They won the game, congrats to \'em.


Trust me, come next year Urlacher and Tommie Harris are going to remember all the chest thumping they did at the end of the game.



So true. It wasn\'t like the Steelers, who took the won and was classy about it. You would of thought Carolina had won the damn superbowl already. No class.

Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #607 on: January 15, 2006, 09:48:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
It isn\'t like the New England game, where they wasn\'t even in the game.
Thats bullshit. The Patriots were definately in the game they just made mistakes at the worst possible times. Look at the stats. Offensively the Pats were pretty much having their way with the Broncos\' D they just couldn\'t finish.

Still, no one really expected the Pats to win it all and they were lucky to even make the playoffs so they were playing with house money to begin with. The Colts on the other hand. lol. I GUARANTEE there are Colts fans/players crying themselves to sleep tonight. lol
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #608 on: January 15, 2006, 11:18:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
Thats bullshit. The Patriots were definately in the game they just made mistakes at the worst possible times. Look at the stats. Offensively the Pats were pretty much having their way with the Broncos\' D they just couldn\'t finish.

Still, no one really expected the Pats to win it all and they were lucky to even make the playoffs so they were playing with house money to begin with. The Colts on the other hand. lol. I GUARANTEE there are Colts fans/players crying themselves to sleep tonight. lol



Glad you are in denial. If you don\'t think any Patsy\'s fans wasn\'t convinced there would be a three-peat, then look at Hurricane, who has done nothing but live in a fantasy world.

P.S - It\'s not how many good plays you make, but how few bad you make and guess what? The Pat\'s was KING of the bad plays Saturday night. You can call it "bullshit", but they played like a high school team at times. All those yards they had passing means nothing when all Denver had to do is go 1 yr for a TD, 3 yrs for a TD and so on.  Due to their failure to maintain the ball, they was NEVER in the GAME.

End of story.

P.S  - Before you come up with the fact Brady as three rings and therefor he is the best QB, keep in mind, Marino is one of the all time bests and he never had a ring.
:)

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #609 on: January 16, 2006, 05:30:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
If the Seahawks win, Shaun will have to play, otherwise, Carolina may very well be able to pull it off. Otherwise, look for Seahawks to win.

Denver and Steelers - Ugly game..

And Luke, I feel your pain. It isn\'t like the New England game, where they wasn\'t even in the game. The Colts and Bears done everything to stay in the game and win the game, but at the very last second it all went downhill.


Quite the opposite, they were in the game til late in the 4th quater.  Denver scored 24 points off of turnovers, you take away the New England mistakes, and its a different ball-game.  None of these errors were "forced" by Denver either, it was just a lack of execution on the side of New England.

I feel the Colts loss is worse than New England\'s in many ways.  New England was never picked to go to the Superbowl.  This was "THE YEAR" for the Colts.  They got the monkey off their back with New England, and they had homefield throuhgout.  To have toyed with a perfect season, and then go one and done, that\'s just terrible.  The Colts were the Superbowl favorites and they got outplayed.

New England just played like crap, the Colts at their best, were not good enough on this day.  They were resilient, I will give them that much.

Chicago\'s loss is a mixed bag.  They were home but they had no playoff experience.  On top of that, their quaterback had maybe 4 games under his belt.  Mismanagement perhaps?  I dunno.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2006, 05:32:09 AM by Mr. Kennedy »
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #610 on: January 16, 2006, 09:24:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Glad you are in denial. If you don\'t think any Patsy\'s fans wasn\'t convinced there would be a three-peat, then look at Hurricane, who has done nothing but live in a fantasy world.

P.S - It\'s not how many good plays you make, but how few bad you make and guess what? The Pat\'s was KING of the bad plays Saturday night. You can call it "bullshit", but they played like a high school team at times. All those yards they had passing means nothing when all Denver had to do is go 1 yr for a TD, 3 yrs for a TD and so on.  Due to their failure to maintain the ball, they was NEVER in the GAME.

End of story.
You are crazy. Did you even watch the game? The Pats offense drove up the field pretty much at will and the defense followed their gameplan and shut down the running game. The Patriots were in the game into the fourth quarter.

As for Pats fans. Of course we wanted to see our team win and we knew that this team was capable of taking it to Detroit but that doesn\'t change the fact that the Pats were playing with house money. They gave the game away on the road in one of the toughest places for road teams to win. The Colts got man handled at home and now their mongoloid QB is throwing players under the bus.

Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
P.S  - Before you come up with the fact Brady as three rings and therefor he is the best QB, keep in mind, Marino is one of the all time bests and he never had a ring. :)
True Marino is one of the all-time bests but NO ONE(outside of Miami) ever picks him above Montana. Why? Because of the rings. In the eyes of History, stats make you a good QB but rings make you a great one. When it is all said and done I think that Brady right now has more rings than Peyton will have in his entire career.
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #611 on: January 16, 2006, 09:47:22 AM »
Quote
Quite the opposite, they were in the game til late in the 4th quater. Denver scored 24 points off of turnovers, you take away the New England mistakes, and its a different ball-game. None of these errors were "forced" by Denver either, it was just a lack of execution on the side of New England.

I feel the Colts loss is worse than New England\'s in many ways. New England was never picked to go to the Superbowl. This was "THE YEAR" for the Colts. They got the monkey off their back with New England, and they had homefield throuhgout. To have toyed with a perfect season, and then go one and done, that\'s just terrible. The Colts were the Superbowl favorites and they got outplayed.

New England just played like crap, the Colts at their best, were not good enough on this day. They were resilient, I will give them that much.


You have the dumbest logic ever, but that is to be expected from you. Both losses are just that, losses. Nothing more. The only difference is the Colts fell behind and almost came back, where as the Patriots just handed that game over. And none of those yards stats matter at the end of the day, not with those turn overs. But, I mean, if you want to come up with insane logic, go for it.

And dumbass of the year award goes to.....

Quote
Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Joey Porter is not known to shy away from a microphone, and that might make him a little lighter in the wallet after his comments after Sunday\'s game against the Indianapolis Colts.

When Troy Polamalu\'s fourth-quarter interception was overturned by referee Pete Morelli, Porter felt the Steelers were facing opponents on two fronts: the Colts and the refs.

"I know they wanted Indy to win this game," Porter told The New York Times. "The whole world loves Peyton Manning, but come on man, don\'t take the game away from us.


Even after the win, he wants to whine about cheating? Questionable call, yes. But that has happened in every single playoff game so far.

Oh and Black - the only reason I ever mentioned Marino is because now everyone is jumpin\' on the \'hate Manning\' bandwagon, but guess what? He didn\'t lose the game. The Colts did. None of them played to their top performance, until the very end and then it was simply to late.

Anyways - with the four teams left, I hope the Steelers win it. Becuase minus dumbass Porter, they are a good team.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2006, 09:56:02 AM by Living-In-Clip »

Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #612 on: January 16, 2006, 09:57:43 AM »
At the end of the day, The Pats lost on the road to the 2nd seed in a stadium where the Broncos rarely lose and the Colts lost at home to the 6th seed in a stadium where the Colts rarely lose.

All these years Colts fans have been saying that homefield advantage would get them to the Superbowl and now they see that Peyton is an overrated player who has never won the big one in his career.

Is it a coincidence that Tennessee didn\'t win the national championship while Peyton Monging was there and win it AS SOON as he leaves? Or could it be that Peyton is just not a winner. He is the Alex Rodriguez of the NFL. He only shows up when the game is meaningless.
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]

Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #613 on: January 16, 2006, 10:00:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
with the four teams left, I hope the Steelers win it. Becuase minus dumbass Porter, they are a good team.
I\'m rooting for the Broncos to win it. Just for the small satisfaction in knowing that your team lost to the eventual champs. If not the Broncos then the Panthers. No Steelers and no Seahawks.
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #614 on: January 16, 2006, 10:01:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
At the end of the day, The Pats lost on the road to the 2nd seed in a stadium where the Broncos rarely lose and the Colts lost at home to the 6th seed in a stadium where the Colts rarely lose.

All these years Colts fans have been saying that homefield advantage would get them to the Superbowl and now they see that Peyton is an overrated player who has never won the big one in his career.

Is it a coincidence that Tennessee didn\'t win the national championship while Peyton Monging was there and win it AS SOON as he leaves? Or could it be that Peyton is just not a winner. He is the Alex Rodriguez of the NFL. He only shows up when the game is meaningless.



Now you are just being abusrd.. Meaningless? Those other 13 games was meaningless? Huh? Playoff run year afer year , meaningless? And how many other great QB\'s have taken years before their first ring? Quite a few.

I love how the Colts haters want to lay the blame all on Manning. None of it goes to VANDERJACT, none of it goes to the offensive line for collapsing and none of it goes on the defense for all those missed tackles. It was obviously MANNING\'s fault. Just like it was obviously Brady\'s fault on Saturday, right?

:rolleyes:

I know you hate Manning as much as I dislike Brady, but even I have enough common sense to not lay all the blame of the loss on one single player.

P.S - Never had delusions of a SB win this year. I knew the Colts would choke. I don\'t care. I still watch football to be excited and that happened yesterday durin\' that 4th QTR. And at least unlike HUrricane, I am not back-pedaling trying to say I never expected a "three-peat"...
:rofl:
« Last Edit: January 16, 2006, 10:03:47 AM by Living-In-Clip »

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk