and if the Rev is a great hit, what stops the other systems from creating something similar and having the best of both worlds? It isn\'t like the other companies don\'t know yet what Nintendo is doing and aren\'t looking into what-ifs and such. Only then they will have the power to back them up. And PS3 won\'t have Beetle Racing 256, It will have Gran Turismo or other high profile games with a remote. or some other gimmick device intended to be different.
and 360 won\'t have Geist with a remote, it would have Halo with a remote.
PS3 won\'t have Mario Strikers with a remote, it will have Winning Eleven with a remote, etc.
Get the picture? Games that people already love, using Nintendo\'s gimmick, completely nullifying the "first-console choice appeal" that Nintendo MIGHT get as a result of being different and easy. But then again, people aren\'t really buying too many more games or systems than they were 10 years ago. No matter the advent of CDs, DVD player in gaming, the Eye Toy, online gaming, etc. If it were just as easy as making a controller easy to use = success, NES or Genesis would still be the biggest thing since sliced bread. Sure, with better graphics, but you get the picture. Of course, you could do alot of the stuff you can do on controllers with more buttons, but where is the fun in having options in games, anyway, right?
I just don\'t understand this mindset at all, I believe that the Saturn Nights Pad or the 360 controller are the best ever because of the placement and amount of buttons on them, hence different options of control and having each button doing something instead of one button with the combination of other factors doing things like what might very well happen with the REV. It\'s cool to have the Golfing and Baseball stuff especially, those are going to be amazingly fun games, but I doubt people are going to want a workout everytime they play a game.
Maybe I am just ranting here.