Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic: No ICT before 2010  (Read 4056 times)

Offline Riku
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2006, 05:47:36 PM »
obviously wasn\'t aimed at you.
Logged
{o,o}
|)__)
-\"-\"-
O rly?

Online Titan

  • Sniper Kitten
  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16575
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • PSN ID: flightlessbeaker
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #16 on: May 23, 2006, 06:14:59 PM »
Oh where is that troll avatar when you need it :)
Logged
Liquid Spam of The Spaminators
"That took some balls to stick a gun in his pants." -Gman
"LOL u know id fuck yu wsboth right? i would love to fuck the both of uyouy

U R FUCJKGIN FCUTE" -THX to luke and Bob
"13 year old girls sleep with older men cause they think theyre in love
13 year old boys sleep with older women cause theyd be stupid not to

Offline Paul2

  • Breath of the Earth
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5873
  • Karma: +11/-0
  • PSN ID: jokermit
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #17 on: May 23, 2006, 09:54:12 PM »
Quote from: Riku
obviously wasn\'t aimed at you.

At me then?  Remember this thread and in 4 plus years from now, see if ICT will ever be implemented.
Logged

Online Titan

  • Sniper Kitten
  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16575
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • PSN ID: flightlessbeaker
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #18 on: May 23, 2006, 09:59:31 PM »
Paul, you should bookmark it and say "I told you so" in 4 years.
Logged
Liquid Spam of The Spaminators
"That took some balls to stick a gun in his pants." -Gman
"LOL u know id fuck yu wsboth right? i would love to fuck the both of uyouy

U R FUCJKGIN FCUTE" -THX to luke and Bob
"13 year old girls sleep with older men cause they think theyre in love
13 year old boys sleep with older women cause theyd be stupid not to
Offline FatalXception
  • The Anti-Spam
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3199
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2006, 10:14:33 PM »
ICT will be defeated by pirates who want to break it within one year, eight months, six days, let alone four years.  In 2010 ICT will be a relic that won\'t be an issue.

You heard it here first!
Logged
FatalXception

Murphy\'s Law - What can go wrong, will.
Poker Law      - Magnum .44 beats four aces.
Cole\'s Law      - Thinly sliced cabbage.
Offline Eiksirf
  • **E!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4398
  • Karma: +10/-0
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #20 on: May 24, 2006, 03:21:06 AM »
Quote from: Riku
wait, where are all those who were talking about being future proof for the next 10 years? Not one of you has anything to say?

Buy the $600 model?
 
-Dan
 
//future-proofing a console is kinda silly, at least in this instance
Logged
\"What are you supposed to be, a clown or something?\"
\"Sometimes.\"
 
http://videogamer.today.com
Offline Riku
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #21 on: May 24, 2006, 04:15:15 AM »
what about those who buy the $500 model thinking they\'re getting a blu-ray player?  What does Sony say if ICT is implemented?  "Well, kind of...you see, you\'ll be able to play these older movies..."

nobody else thinks this could potentially be a mess?
Logged
{o,o}
|)__)
-\"-\"-
O rly?
Offline fastson
  • Keyser Söze
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7080
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #22 on: May 24, 2006, 04:24:34 AM »
Oh geez. Lighten up will you?

Its not the end of the world if you have to buy a $5.99 player Anno Domini 2010 IF ICT ever gets used (which I very much doubt now). ;)

And people who are interested in movies most likely will get the $599 model in the first place, HDMI is da new THANG and its digital. Digital > analog everybody knows that. :gfight:
Logged
\"Behold, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed\"
-Axel Oxenstierna 1648
Offline Riku
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #23 on: May 24, 2006, 04:33:04 AM »
Quote from: fastson
Oh geez. Lighten up will you?

Its not the end of the world if you have to buy a $5.99 player Anno Domini 2010 IF ICT ever gets used (which I very much doubt now). ;)

And people who are interested in movies most likely will get the $599 model in the first place, HDMI is da new THANG and its digital. Digital > analog everybody knows that. :gfight:


not everybody knows that.

Geez.  I remember when so many of you were saying shit about Microsoft and their two skus, saying how it would confuse the customer.  This is at least as bad as that (I think worse since you can\'t upgrade) and all of you think it\'s perfectly fine.
Logged
{o,o}
|)__)
-\"-\"-
O rly?
Offline fastson
  • Keyser Söze
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7080
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #24 on: May 24, 2006, 04:41:45 AM »
Quote from: Riku
not everybody knows that.

Geez.  I remember when so many of you were saying shit about Microsoft and their two skus, saying how it would confuse the customer.  This is at least as bad as that (I think worse since you can\'t upgrade) and all of you think it\'s perfectly fine.


No since what Microsoft did was split up their userbase when it comes to GAMES, thats the primary function of both of these machines. A 360 Core user CAN NOT play every 360 game, unless he gets the HDD for $100 (?).
On the PS3 a core user will be able to play ALL games, but after 2010 he might not be able to watch every single BD movie in High Def, but thats a secondary function anyway.

Its really no comparison, the 360 situation is far worse.
Logged
\"Behold, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed\"
-Axel Oxenstierna 1648

Offline clips

  • In ChArGe..Ya DiG?!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7807
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: Blackgas7
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #25 on: May 24, 2006, 04:56:52 AM »
Quote from: Riku
what about those who buy the $500 model thinking they\'re getting a blu-ray player?  What does Sony say if ICT is implemented?  "Well, kind of...you see, you\'ll be able to play these older movies..."

nobody else thinks this could potentially be a mess?


riku earlier you was kinda actin like a little kid in response to this news, but i guess that can be forgiven as in the past you posted some very respectable threads..that said and if i\'m reading that article above correctly, the xbox is going to have issues here as well right? ultimately at the end of the day people should opt for the 599 version and be done with it. but even if they do implement this ict thing, by 2010 it may not be that big an issue and people will probably be purchasing stand alone players in general...


i\'ve already posted a thread comparing both versions of ps3\'s... this article here is stating some negative things about the ps3, but i think it touches on the issues you speak of...


http://gear.ign.com/articles/709/709495p1.html
Logged
knowledge, wisdom & understanding..these are the basic fundamentals of life

if you can\'t amaze them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh*t....
Offline Riku
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #26 on: May 24, 2006, 05:28:40 AM »
fasty, Sony is going to market the PS3 as more than a games machine.  Kuturagi is calling it a cheap blu-ray player/super-computer.  Microsoft told every developer to make their games as if not to count on the HDD.  So far, two games are being made with it in mind (Final Fantasy XI and Football Manager).  Seems like the mass majority of developers are listening to MS.

clips, Microsoft is going to run in to the same problem with their HD-DVD add-on.  Why they\'re even bothering I\'m not sure.  

It\'s the fact that you\'ll have to buy a stand-alone machine in order to keep your blu-ray library growing.  Why didn\'t Sony include a HDMI slot on the cheaper model?  Are they that expensive?
« Last Edit: May 24, 2006, 05:30:14 AM by Riku »
Logged
{o,o}
|)__)
-\"-\"-
O rly?
Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #27 on: May 24, 2006, 05:38:56 AM »
take your meds, bro

mean ol\' sony isn\'t out to get you
Logged
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza
Offline Eiksirf
  • **E!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4398
  • Karma: +10/-0
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #28 on: May 24, 2006, 05:45:59 AM »
Probably to force tech heads to throw another $100 their way. The thing is, the lack of an HDMI port has nothing to do with gameplay. The video game console is not affected one way or another. If you want higher potential resolution output, you throw down another $100.
 
They\'re offering two skus, for better or worse, and that\'s the main question that the consumer is faced with when selecting between them.
 
They should have released the fully-loaded console only, for $550, if you ask me. Or just bit the bullet and stuck with $500 which, when compared to the X360 doesn\'t seem too bad.
 
-Dan
Logged
\"What are you supposed to be, a clown or something?\"
\"Sometimes.\"
 
http://videogamer.today.com
Offline Riku
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
No ICT before 2010
« Reply #29 on: May 24, 2006, 05:58:00 AM »
Quote from: mm
take your meds, bro

mean ol\' sony isn\'t out to get you


didn\'t say they were out to get me.  I just don\'t understand what they\'re doing.
Logged
{o,o}
|)__)
-\"-\"-
O rly?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk