Game collection?

SixAXIS is a gimmick so far.

Motion Blur on anything is disgusting.

60fps cut scenes are useless.

The rest, I agree with.

[BizioEE]

Just got PSM...GT5 prologue: 9 / DMC4: 9.5 and Burnout Paradise: 10 !

so my next game together with Uncharted and R&C ?
...it will be Burnout Paradise \'cause is the only one available for me

next the other two !

ps: still playing Uncharted, cannot stop playing it...now 35% at the hardest level...challenging

[Viper_Fujax]

i feel like fueling some fire

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/848/848783p3.html

add another game on the list of games where the ps3 version is subtly worse aesthetically..hopefully they fix stuff like that by later this year

Motion Blur on anything is disgusting.

Yeah only if you knew what you were talking about

You do a nice job of trolling.

If only you knew what you were talking about. A lot of people don\'t care for motion blur, I fall into that category.

I know you\'re dumb, but come on, you\'re not that dumb .

But as Viper, already pointed out, yet another game released for both consoles, where the PS3 version falls behind. Does it matter? No. Just like the PS3 version being slightly ahead of the 360 version doesn\'t matter.

You do a nice job of trolling.

If only you knew what you were talking about. A lot of people don\'t care for motion blur, I fall into that category.

I know you\'re dumb, but come on, you\'re not that dumb .

But as Viper, already pointed out, yet another game released for both consoles, where the PS3 version falls behind. Does it matter? No. Just like the PS3 version being slightly ahead of the 360 version doesn\'t matter.

Yawn as if this has to do with anything. Or perhaps you didnt even know what that link was about prooving once more how ridiculous you are

You just trolled about "motion blur on anything" and ridiculed yourself for not knowing what you were talking about.

You do a nice job of trolling.

If only you knew what you were talking about. A lot of people don\'t care for motion blur, I fall into that category.

I know you\'re dumb, but come on, you\'re not that dumb .

But as Viper, already pointed out, yet another game released for both consoles, where the PS3 version falls behind. Does it matter? No. Just like the PS3 version being slightly ahead of the 360 version doesn\'t matter.

Yawn and this is relevant with what? Or perhaps you didnt even know what that link was about proving once more how ridiculous you are

You just trolled. Like always. Only this time about the motion blur.

Oh, okay.

Gotcha - trolling is now defined by stating a personal preference.

Thanks for clearing that up, local forum idiot.

Motion blurr as it was done on PS2 (check out GTA Vice City) was disgusting.. but the way they did it in SOTC was beautiful.

[BizioEE]

i feel like fueling some fire

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/848/848783p3.html

add another game on the list of games where the ps3 version is subtly worse aesthetically..hopefully they fix stuff like that by later this year

and why ? just to show how some developers are lazy and/or not capable of pushing a more difficult and complex hardware ?
Me will just get 1st party games and the best multi-platform as COD4, Burnout paradise, DMC4, etc...and don\'t care about crap of crappy developers...but again, if you want to add these "games" to the list feel free to do it...for the ones who care...

Oh, okay.

Gotcha - trolling is now defined by stating a personal preference.

Thanks for clearing that up, local forum idiot.

boohoo*sniff* the forum\'s biggest troll who also happens to think that his generic opinion and personal preference should count for everyone, hurt my feelings.

boohoo*sniff* the forum\'s biggest troll who also happens to think that his generic opinion and personal preference should count for everyone, hurt my feelings.

You sure do a nice job of padding your post count, because obviously that is what you\'re doing, as you don\'t even try to come up with a logical reason for your bullshit posts.

and why ? just to show how some developers are lazy and/or not capable of pushing a more difficult and complex hardware ?
Me will just get 1st party games and the best multi-platform as COD4, Burnout paradise, DMC4, etc...and don\'t care about crap of crappy developers...but again, if you want to add these "games" to the list feel free to do it...for the ones who care...

And this is just plain stupid also.
So, if a developer\'s game doesn\'t surpass the 360, it is simply because they are "lazy" and are there for passed off as crappy developers.

Just plain stupid. Things such as screen tearing are common complaints among a lot of PS3 games. Is that the developers fault? Or is it Sony\'s fault? What good is "complex hardware" when a lot of developers simply are too "lazy" to develop and take advantage of that hardware?

[Viper_Fujax]

and why ? just to show how some developers are lazy and/or not capable of pushing a more difficult and complex hardware ?
Me will just get 1st party games and the best multi-platform as COD4, Burnout paradise, DMC4, etc...and don\'t care about crap of crappy developers...but again, if you want to add these "games" to the list feel free to do it...for the ones who care...

didnt realize ubisoft was a crappy crap developer

I just saw turok and felt like posting about it..im sure .3 points is a huge difference.

whenever i have a chance of poking gman, ill do it...if you know what i mean

[BizioEE]

And this is just plain stupid also.
So, if a developer\'s game doesn\'t surpass the 360, it is simply because they are "lazy" and are there for passed off as crappy developers.

show me where I said this

if a developer\'s game doesn\'t surpass the 360, it is simply because they are "lazy" and are there for passed off as crappy developers.

...maybe if this game looks worst or a lot worst on PS3...which is different

What I think, and I\'ll tell you again, if multiplatform game A is looking better on XBox360 it means 1) it\'s a lazy port from XBox360 2) the dev is familiar with PC architecture/old architecture and still not confident with PS3 new hardware 3) a combination of 1) and 2) just to make it easy...

...maybe I was overdoing with the word "crap"...maybe those dev who produce games like Turok on PS3 are not the best in the World, not at the same level of Polyphony, ND, Insomniac, Square, Ico Dev, etc, etc, etc or maybe an "unlucky attempt"...sure what I see(Turok) is a very bad result!

Just plain stupid. Things such as screen tearing are common complaints among a lot of PS3 games. Is that the developers fault? Or is it Sony\'s fault? What good is "complex hardware" when a lot of developers simply are too "lazy" to develop and take advantage of that hardware?

Sure it\'s not Sony fault, and what about the  "complex hardware" ?!...it\'s enough we see the best games on PS3, wich look (for me) better than anything on the X360, and it\'s just the end of 1st gen for PS3...Sony is just looking in the long term, just a different strategy...

[BizioEE]

Raz, get Devil May Cry 4 on PS3! No screen tearing at all or frame rate slowdown. It runs solid and smooth! Load times are zero in the levels, and maybe half a second between mission end and start screens!

ps: these are good developers !  ...kidding...just a great Game !  Cannot wait !