okay, I am bored - so I will replay to this lame post (can\'t resist.. hehe).
1. Graphics
You are forgeting that the PS2 has a steap learning curve. X-Box and GameCube both feature an easy architecture and DirectX and OpenGL to make programming easier. The PS2 how ever is pretty raw in terms of programming (it\'s tough), but as it showed, the PS2 is the only real inovative console in terms of hardware outthere. It has the newest technology and it\'s heaps more powerful than it seems. I believe that when developers really understand the architecture once, we will see some pretty amazing stuff. Konami, Polyphony, SCE-Liverpool, Capcom and other and smaller developers are already showing off their gift. Thanks to the unique and powerful architecture the PS2 has, I bet it will be just as good as X-box\'s graphics soon.
Something\'s quite ironic though: if Microsoft sais there console is 3 to 4 times more powerful than current consoles (meaning the PS2) and the architecture being so easy, why aren\'t we seing graphics that are surpassing PS2\'s by 3 or 4 times?
2. Support
First parties? *LOL* you\'re kidding right? Gran Turismo is probably the most successful racing series at the moment. Oh wait, Naughty Dog, SCE Liverpool, SCE Cambridge Studios, Team Soho plus a lot of others that are under Sony\'s 2nd party developers. Yep, all exclusives and the games are getting better and better. If you ask me, Sony has every reason to be among the big 3rd parties. All my most anticipated games (take out MGS2 and DMC) are from SCE. I don\'t see the problem...
Yep, it\'s hard to develop for (the PS2), but as developers have stated, it has a steap learning curve and once they have overcome this, things will get a lot better. And it\'s already paying off. Just look at BG:DA and that\'s from a very small developer team. Don\'t worry tshirts, Sony is doing the right thing to make things easier for the developers.
Many fanboys will argue with you and say "it doesn\'t matter how hard it is, if they are getting paid for it they will do it".....
As long as the results are there, it doesn\'t matter. And again, the PS2 isn\'t that hard to make any development nearly as bad as you make it to be. I guess you\'ve been swallowing too much of Larne Lornings (sp?) crap, eh?
3. History is a cycle
What the ****? Oh yeah, I get it: just because "History is a cycle" we should all dumb our PS2s and get a Xbox? Sony won last generation, so it\'s impossible for them to win this one too :rolleyes:
how much pot did you smoke?
Fanboys will also cite "how can anyone top 20 million consoles"...
Simple. Through time. No console ever wins in their first year. How long did it take the Genesis to lead.....2-3 years. PSX? 2-3 years....the cycle will repeat. Microsoft will get a strong hold on the market, and through time, they will carve straight into the PS2\'s dominance. Nothing happens over night.
How long did it take PSX to reach 20 million consoles? PS2 is already the most successful console and it\'s just gettin better. I don\'t see where your problem is, son.
Why will Sony fail? They are not transcending the industry forward. We are not playing the PSX anymore and they don\'t realize that.
Pretty strange. 80 million sold worldwide today and still selling. Games are still in development and coming (Syphon Filter 3, Harry Potter). I think there are a few that might not share your opinion dude... wake up. Life\'s a *****.
I have no doubt in my mind Microsoft will accomplish such a feat from the reasons I gave above. They are a serious competitor and the PS2 will not stand a chance.....not this generation anyway.
Great, then get your Xbox and live happily ever after. I know I will with my PS2. Oh wait, no I can\'t, not enough money to get all those AAA titles this and next month.