Xbox hardware does outclass any console of this generation--just look at almost any port or any game that is on all three systems. Fact of the matter is that they are comparable because they are the same price. I don\'t compare xbox to GC because GC is $100. [GC is $150, and that makes no sense, what you just said there.
-Eik]
The market has deemed that xbox, GC (if you subtract the dvd abilities) and PS2 are on par, competing products to the consumer. That makes them comparable.
But beyond that mm and I aren\'t debating console specs, we\'re debating "great game" criteria and that is where the double standard is.
_____________
i NEVER say "ps2 is better" or " Gt3 didnt have blur"
_____________
No, but you don\'t say that it does either. That\'s my point. I never said RC was the best driving game out there, I said it\'s one of the best looking, you say no it isn\'t, horrendous blur. So, show me a game that bests it, and that doesn\'t have "blur". Or show me where you invaded a thread, went completely off topic to trash a PS2 game? You don\'t do it.
How can you like any PS2 game with such high graphical standards? How do you over look the blur, fogging, slowdown, bad textures, bad camera, woeful clipping and completely love GTA3 on the PS2 (before PC version)?
How can "blur" completely render RC terrible, while GTA3 can rise above it and be one of your favourites?
And what A+ PS2 games have been released in the past couple months?
