The Flaws of the PS2

Originally posted by Clowd



until i post x obox sucks...........

isn\'t that my LINE





damn it its nearly a week since i bashed the box, this job hunting is cutting in on some serious hate time

Plus i can do iorny like its Doomsday or something

//me thinks of something funny to poke fun at

"ah ah ah Bill gates has bad breath...errmmm ok maybe he dosen\'t...please don\'t sue me billy only joking you make a wonderful s©readsheet and wordprocessr plus spool chooker "

still...the pics fastson posted show PS2 is not good in texturing...it\'s a limitation of the hardware...is it too difficult to admit for PS2 fanboys?

Admit what? Just because of people who prejudge consoles from what they see say so? They take crappy games to prove their arguement and then call it fact and all this crap about limitation of the hardware. If I\'d do the same, I could go on all day long about how Xbox sucks at framerates, horrendous blur and blame "limitation of the hardware" for it. Not quite valid is it?

Originally posted by Clowd



until i post x obox sucks, you cant really say this

Yeah I can, considering how some of your statements in the past seem to lack any sense of reason whatsoever.

Im sorry but i dont know what statements your talking about can you refresh my memory?

Originally posted by Clowd
Im sorry but i dont know what statements your talking about can you refresh my memory?

Like in here:
http://www.psx2central.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22141

Or here, where the biasness of the news comes and goes depending on where you thought it came from:
http://www.psx2central.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22292

Perhaps there are better examples, but overall I\'ve never a good example of logic coming from you.

Originally posted by nonamer


Like in here:
http://www.psx2central.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22141

Or here, where the biasness of the news comes and goes depending on where you thought it came from:
http://www.psx2central.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22292

Perhaps there are better examples, but overall I\'ve never a good example of logic coming from you.

i proved in that first link i was the only one who knew about the van allen belt  = 1 point to Clowd

In that second link biozee or whoever posted that news posted it with from team x box, as you can see they edited the news, got it from the original source and changed the link to eurogamer, no team x box as it originally was, i cant blame you for thinking i was talking nonsense there when the post was edited to make me look like a fool  = 1 point to Clowd

Total tally

Clowd = 2

nonamer = 0

I want the x box to fail because it will teach m$ a lesson, that they just cant buy into any business they want

While this is but one example, it speaks volumes.

[edit]

here\'s some more:

"PS2 fans are the most informed"

"PS2 fans are more informed, the ones in japan, they know what console to buy, and what console to buy 800 of, so they have good taste and are informed, the fans in american seem to be bought by m$ 500 million ad campaign, not so in japan, who can blame the fans in american, bought into the hype"

or how about when you said there should only be one console, I\'m almost sure you inclined it should be PS2...I\'m still looking for it...

Originally posted by Clowd


i proved in that first link i was the only one who knew about the van allen belt  = 1 point to Clowd

Which was disproven before you even posted in there. Read up on that rebuttle(sp?) 5 post down from the top. Plus the fact that you didn\'t believe that humans landed on the Moon in the first place pretty much says it all.

In that second link biozee or whoever posted that news posted it with from team x box, as you can see they edited the news, got it from the original source and changed the link to eurogamer, no team x box as it originally was, i cant blame you for thinking i was talking nonsense there when the post was edited to make me look like a fool  = 1 point to Clowd[/quote

The actually text of that piece of news nevered changed, yet your outlook on the bias of that newsbit seems to change.

Total tally

Clowd = 2

nonamer = 0

Why are you keeping score?

he has the "alteredbeast" desease

people who take stuff a little too seriously

Originally posted by nonamer
The actually text of that piece of news nevered changed, yet your outlook on the bias of that newsbit seems to change.

Im seeing that you never seen the team x box bit of that news?  There was about 2 paragraphs of team x box bits on the end of the newsbit, very bias stuff

Originally posted by BizioEE


I said PS2 is inferior in texturing capabilities...not overall to DC!
idiot!:)

tell me how this thread is useless now...it is creating discussion

Xbox has a crappy processing chip.  It\'s Intel but it is basically a Celeron.  733mhz but CISC while PS2 is like 300mhz but RISC.  Most ppl get fooled by the numbers but 733mhz CISC is nothing comparing to PS2\'s chip and it definitely aint no Pentium 3 chip as they try to market it.  If definitely does not say that on the chip.

PS2 has double Xbox\'s Floating Point Performance as well.  So when it comes to running complex games and holding good graphics at the same time, PS2 is easily much better.

Sorry for the dumb Xbox owners.  They basically got ****ed by MS.

Originally posted by smoke\'emtrees
Xbox has a crappy processing chip.  It\'s Intel but it is basically a Celeron.  733mhz but CISC while PS2 is like 300mhz but RISC.  Most ppl get fooled by the numbers but 733mhz CISC is nothing comparing to PS2\'s chip and it definitely aint no Pentium 3 chip as they try to market it.  If definitely does not say that on the chip.

PS2 has double Xbox\'s Floating Point Performance as well.  So when it comes to running complex games and holding good graphics at the same time, PS2 is easily much better.

Sorry for the dumb Xbox owners.  They basically got ****ed by MS.

That\'s...a whole lotta information.

All I need to know is what games are where, not whats under the hood.

Xbox has a crappy processing chip. It\'s Intel but it is basically a Celeron. 733mhz but CISC while PS2 is like 300mhz but RISC. Most ppl get fooled by the numbers but 733mhz CISC is nothing comparing to PS2\'s chip and it definitely aint no Pentium 3 chip as they try to market it. If definitely does not say that on the chip.

Do you even know the meaning of CISC and RISC, yet alone the difference?
The XCPU btw is as much a Pentium as it is a Celeron. Not that it would matter anyway.

PS2 has double Xbox\'s Floating Point Performance as well. So when it comes to running complex games and holding good graphics at the same time, PS2 is easily much better.

Guess so, but that doesn\'t mean PS2\'s better. :rolleyes: Both chips handle different tasks... not trying to underrate the Emotion Engine, but you can\'t compare Apples to Oranges.

No offence smoke\'emtrees, but it doesn\'t fair well when you bring up old threads. Unless you really bring in some good and valid arguements, don\'t bother bringing up old threads.

Do you know the difference between CISC and RISC???  CISC is better used for running Windows while RISC is better used for stuff like games.

Do you know the difference between Pentium and Celeron?  If you did, you would not want Celeron unless you want a short hardware life

I\'m just pointing out the flaws of Xbox as they claim to be the most powerful and they are full of it.  We already know the serious lack of good games but their main argument is how great their hardware is.

Floating Point Peformance is a very important factor unless you want simple games that just show off nice pretty colors.  Whether PS2 games will end up using that potential is another question but I know that Xbox has have that potential and it already shows.