I mean, the Gamecube is a year and a half newer than the PS2, but it\'s games are hardly better looking. Sure, the textures and output is a lot cleaner, but there are alot of things that the PS2 can still touch the GC in. Maybe GC should have gone the standardized PC way, so that it could compete with XBox, which is far and away more powerful in nearly every aspect?
-------------------
I see you bitching about how XBoxes PC architecture is holding it back, yet it is MUCH more powerful than the other two systems, as is shown by EA\'s assessment. EA also goes on to say how weak GC truly is and goes as far as saying if it wasn\'t for their kids, they wouldn\'t develop on GC at all
XBox\'s PC arch. makes it easier for developers to get what they want out of a game, especially effects not possible on the other two systems, and concentrate on other things, like experience. Right now some developers are creating particularly empty games. But this happened with PSX, Dreamcast, even PS2. XBox is just getting it\'s \'shine with no substance\' right now. You can already point out the next classics though, Panzer Orta, Ninja Gaiden, Steel Batallion, and Project Ego all look amazing, yet also sound like they will be amazing gaming experiences also.
The only thing that is holding XBox back is it\'s lack of HUGE success al la PS2. When developers make games especially for XBox, games turn out truly beautiful. DOA3, GUNVALKYRIE, and Halo could not be done on any other system in the quality they are right now, I will tell you that.
Eric Jacob