Originally posted by GigaShadow
Adan, you are mixing apples and oranges when you compare the colonial era (appx. 1600-1800 AD) to what has and is happening in Iraq.
The Spanish you speak is the pure form Adan, not the bastardized form that they speak in Mexico.
Mixing apples and oranges? In 1600, europeans (Spanish, Portuguese and Italians mainly) went to America (South and North) and did the following:
- Invade the land without any logical reason
- Killed the people they wanted
- Picked up the gold
- Established a domain
- Came back home
Now in Irak, USA does the following:
- Invade the land without any logical reason
- Kills the people they want
- Picks up the black gold
- Establishes a domain
- Comes back home
I can\'t see many differences. Spaniards remained there many years, but we don\'t know how many Americans will stay there because oil is a sweet reward.
Well, it\'s true that "my spanish" is not the same than latinoamérica one (

) South America spanish is different to ours in the same way USA\'s english is quite different from England\'s one. In this case you will be the "bastarized speakers" and english the pure speakers. That\'s not the point. Language evolves because it\'s a natural skill. In the same way people from Japan is different to Frenchs physically speaking, languages that are separated evolves in different ways.
Just notice that even in your country you can distinguish different accents. And that\'s inside a country, imagine the differences in between a language separated by an ocean and 7000 kilometres.