God Damn thread closing hippies

[SirMystiq]

Originally posted by Luke
Mystic, all of those events took place cause those people were morons, not cause they smoked weed.

That\'s the point. MJ was the CAUSE for all those problems. And all of those people are the ones that I know smoke weed the most, and it will probably increase with the current fad about it.

If there were no such thing as weed, those people woulda found some other way to be morons.


That\'s like blaming the car in a car accident.


I guess in some car accidents you CAN blame the car but you know what I mean.

Originally posted by SirMystiq
That\'s the point. MJ was the CAUSE for all those problems. And all of those people are the ones that I know smoke weed the most, and it will probably increase with the current fad about it.

I suppose guns kill people as well and not just stupid people with a gun. I can tell you are young. Smarten up. Those people were already to damn stupid to live anyway, it wasnt the green.

I don\'t approve of the weedage, but I think that most would agree that it\'s a bit hipocritical to allow cigarettes and alcohol to be purchased freely, while the ganja train is derailed.  I mean they all have the same basic risk factors assosiated with them, it\'s just that the shrubbery doesn\'t have the big business money behind it.

If you buy weed, you support terrorism

[SirMystiq]

Originally posted by TSina
I suppose guns kill people as well and not just stupid people with a gun. I can tell you are young. Smarten up. Those people were already to damn stupid to live anyway, it wasnt the green.

No. Guns don\'t kill people. People kill people. But if there were any guns, would there still be people killing each other with them?

If there was no weed, would any of the "stupid" people be doing the same thing?

Those "damn stupid" people are the ones that smoke MJ and waste most of their money on it. So by claiming that they are the ones that are "damn stupid to live anyways" you are basically throwing out most of the pot heads who smoke it. Look at Vivi, he thinks smoking weed is cool and it doesn\'t hurt you because he\'s never seen it hurt you. Is he stupid because of it? No, but he is blinded by the fad.

The whole idea of having Mj, smoking Mj, "getting high" is what causes the problems. It\'s that idea that encourages people to kill each other for it, to steal to buy some more and to lie in order to obtain more of it.

I think it is hypocritical to allow alcohol and cigarretes. But first off, cigarretes don\'t slow down your nerves and impare your judgement, and if people are too stupid to know that it might cause desease that is their own business. Alcohol is just as bad as MJ. But it took it some time in order for it to become "part" of people. Bringing in yet another substance that impares judgemnt would be alot worse than it already is with alcohol. Alcohol it might take some time to feel anything depending on what you are drinking. Weed just takes 1-3 puffs and if it doesn\'t it\'s considered bad weed. Like dro that only takes what? 1 hit?

And like I\'ve said before. Buying the stuff only helps out the ones dealing it. Which causes even more problems and only kills the ones who are being sold harder drugs from the same dealer that sells you the weed. So if you take all that into account, when you buy weed, you are basically helping some other poor fool with a heroin addiction slip away from his life.

You say legalize it and it would solve the problem. After it becomes legalized, like alcohol, people(us humans) will once again have that craving for something that is banned. What could happen? Cocain the next "weed".

Originally posted by SirMystiq
No. Guns don\'t kill people. People kill people. But if there were any guns, would there still be people killing each other with them?

Thats an oxymoron.

If there was no weed, would any of the "stupid" people be doing the same thing?

they would be doing other stupid things because they are stupid.

Those "damn stupid" people are the ones that smoke MJ and waste most of their money on it. So by claiming that they are the ones that are "damn stupid to live anyways" you are basically throwing out most of the pot heads who smoke it. Look at Vivi, he thinks smoking weed is cool and it doesn\'t hurt you because he\'s never seen it hurt you. Is he stupid because of it? No, but he is blinded by the fad.

How do you know how much they spend on it to claim it is most of their money? Even if that is true, it is their money to spend on what they wish correct? Not really since most people that smoke weed are not potheads but rather the occasional smoker. He is stupid if he thinks it isnt harmful at all. You are stupid if you believe what the .gov tells you about it. Did you even read the 12 points I posted? Fad? Do you really think smoking weed is a fad? Fad\'s go away. Weed smoking for recreational purposes has been around for many hundreds of years.

The whole idea of having Mj, smoking Mj, "getting high" is what causes the problems. It\'s that idea that encourages people to kill each other for it, to steal to buy some more and to lie in order to obtain more of it.

This is just silly. Ive seen to coke heads fight over the last line. I\'ve seen several crack heads fight over a sliver of rock. I\'ve seen drunks fight about ANYTHING. Not once have I seen people fighting over a blunt or "because they were high"  Stealing and lying for more? Are you sure these ppl dont have other habits they are hiding since MJ is more acceptable than the rest of the drugs?

I think it is hypocritical to allow alcohol and cigarretes. But first off, cigarretes don\'t slow down your nerves and impare your judgement, and if people are too stupid to know that it might cause desease that is their own business. Alcohol is just as bad as MJ. But it took it some time in order for it to become "part" of people. Bringing in yet another substance that impares judgemnt would be alot worse than it already is with alcohol. Alcohol it might take some time to feel anything depending on what you are drinking. Weed just takes 1-3 puffs and if it doesn\'t it\'s considered bad weed. Like dro that only takes what? 1 hit?

It is hypocritical. The slowing of nerves is actually quite good for a great number of people. Smoking weed is no where as near as bad as drinking. Dont know where you got that information. You obviously dont smoke if it only takes a few puffs. Even purple haze, it takes more than one hit. That is different for every person though.

And like I\'ve said before. Buying the stuff only helps out the ones dealing it. Which causes even more problems and only kills the ones who are being sold harder drugs from the same dealer that sells you the weed. So if you take all that into account, when you buy weed, you are basically helping some other poor fool with a heroin addiction slip away from his life.

Drug dealing within itself is a victimless crime. Drug lords and empires are a different story. When I buy weed, I help the man selling it. I in no way hurt any other addict as they have their own mind like I do.

You say legalize it and it would solve the problem. After it becomes legalized, like alcohol, people(us humans) will once again have that craving for something that is banned. What could happen? Cocain the next "weed".

Decriminalization is the answer, legalizing solves nothing. Then the government taxes it and a dime bag is now $12.50. So the drug dealer is still a drug deal because t hey have the cheaper price. Cocaine was legal for quite some time. Racism is what made cocaine illegal. Look it up sometime. Not to mention, the government cant make MORE money off of it being illegal. No more seizures of dirty money since a controlled substance was found with it. They also dont have the ability to redistribute it on the streets(conspiracy theory). Check out the crack explosion on the streets back in the 70\'s. You will see many indications of the gov being involved. You think the same does not happen with weed and any other drug for that fact?

Originally posted by TSina
Im still waiting for some people to take on a piece of what I posted.

Yawn, drop the hot shit attitude.

Time for a new thread, because I want to join.

New rule; You cannot debate in the thread unless you have seen, smoked, did smoke, do smoke, or been somewhere where someone has.

Im sick of these fagets saying "But weed is bad! The government is always right, Pamplets!"

When this gets too long, Im going to do that.

It\'s not about being hot stuff. I just dont like how people talk about something so strongly and dont really know anything about i besides personal experiance, or someone else experiance. You could have kept your useless comment to yourself since I didnt say anything smartassed to you anyway.

No wonder why someone else said females dont stick around here.

And your anti-marijuana or what?

I cant really tell, because Im "keeping the my self sane right now".

[glow=green]:smokin:[/glow]

Im very much in favor cheeba. Im not stupid either. Thats why I posted the 12 most popular points concerning weed on the 5th page. Some are in our favor, others are not, yet there is open display of what "I" think to be the *real* truths about ms. mary.

[§ôµÏG®ïñD]

i wonder, TSina do u smoke pot?  


There are other sites that say otherwise too.   Its really in the air in terms of whats correct and whats not.

What if you were in a greenhouse of marijuana, and the inside caught on fire.

I know how I want to die.

did you look at the credits and sources? all sites are not so credible.

and yes, i do smoke once a week or sooo now. my job doesnt really make it easy to smoke. I\'ll be doing it less and less too.

Besides, my smoking or not smoking hasnt much to do with my views. My feelings were the same as they are now if not more reinforced since I smoked my first 3 years ago at 22

Also, how can certaion studies be up in the air? Facts are facts. Look att anti-weed studies, they are almost always biased and leave info out. While the same can be said about pro-weed studies, more often than not they dont misconstrue(sp?) the facts. For example,in the US we have had this one commmercial that ran for a while stating that more car accidents involved weed than other substances. They did leave out the fact that while THC was present in the blood stream of the drivers,  their BAC was through the roof. Misleading no?