Give me a god damn break.
They\'re not being an \'alternative source\'. They are riling up the Arabs and inciting violence against us under the guise of journalism.
Whose purpose is served by delivering Al-Qaeda\'s messages to the masses? None but Al-Qaeda\'s, of course.
Frankly, my nation is at war. And I want our enemies dead. I couldn\'t give half a shit whether their opinions are heard or not. The only thing I want to hear out of them is screams of pain. By serving as their courier, Al-Jazeera functions as their tool, and thus, to me, they are guilty of prolonging and deepening this conflict.
How can anyone give them \'props\' for being an alternative to Fox? That\'s sickening. I wonder how many Arabs give props to Fox for being an alternative to Al-Jazeera? I\'ll be the first to admit that Fox is definitely slanted to the right (and I love it), but their slant is one I agree with. Al-J is definitely slanted towards the terrorist\'s opinions, and they make no effort to be balanced and unbiased.
So what am I to take from your laudatory comments? Are you both really so ignorant as to think Al-J is unbiased, or do you support them because of their bias?