I\'m not ignorant, and coming from you that doesn\'t mean much. I don\'t really take a stand on anything one way or the other, I\'m just trying to create conversation. I\'d rather remain neutral on this topic because it is quite controversial. Anyway, I was just giving an example, but I too feel it\'s a combination of both, which is a mix of evolutionary and cognitive psychology.
Who knows, Evi.. 3000 years ago, you too might have taken an 8 year old boy as your lover. Certain societies once deemed that \'natural\'.
![:stick:](https://psx5central.com/community/Smileys/PSX4Central/stick.gif)
Well, if that\'s your arguement, I can see the logic. But the majority of sex that humans have takes place for pleasure
People, especially evolutionists, tend to avoid that point for some stupid reason. They think reproduction is the only reason for sex. Why else would there be ten buh-jillion nerve endings in that one part of the body?
They have moved far beyond having sex for reproduction.
Sex for pleasure has been happening since all of recorded history. Even monkeys have sex for pleasure. They have sex to relieve stress, so I\'ve read.