Guantanamo detainee resorts to suicide.

[SirMystiq]

Originally posted by GigaShadow
quotas.

Nah, it was a scholarship coupled with financial aid from the school.

The comment your are talking about was posted on another thread and was is in no way meant to validate anything that I have posted so far. Liberals or Democrats for the most part win most of the arguments in that class and there is really nothing else to say. I\'m not using it to validate anything, it stayed in topic in the thread that it was posted on.

Blowing the humanity deal is important because people like Giga are validating the very things that this country and its people are supposed to opposse and get rid off. To not abide by our own standards is ignorant and will only hurt us in the long run.

Of course liberals and democrats win most of the arguements in your classes because the professor is liberal.  Liberals tend to disregard facts when they don\'t confirm to their warped ideas.

Get off your humanity and peace crusade - it is unrealistic and ignorant to think we have some moral responsibility to captured terrorists.

Yea  the best thing one of my business professors explained to us with Repub\'s and Dem\'s. Dem\'s will tell you a story and fantasize things, where as republicans like to give straight facts. His opinion but there\'s lots of truth to it.

It\'s easy to win a debate when you are pulling bullshit out of your mouth and all other orfaces.

Both conservatives and liberals are guilty of talking out of their asses. Take off your blindfolds.

I remember a story I read in high school. It went like this:

There was once a perfect utopia. Crime did not have a definition. People never locked their doors. No one begged. It was a spotless Eden glowing with an aura of virtue and purity. However, there was a remote house deep in the center of the town that no one approached. Indeed, the townsfolk denied its very existence. In that house was a boy. Chained and naked, he sat on his own excrement in the darkness of that windowless house. His body was covered with sores that festered as the boy slept on his own waste, sores that always bled with puss. And when someone came to slide him his food through a slit in the wall, the boy would speak only to be answered with hurried silence.

The existence of the town somehow depended on the existence of this boy.         I think this story is very fitting given the current situation.

I understand they talk out of their asses but you gotta admit the dem\'s do it quite a bit more.

[clips]

Originally posted by hyper
Both conservatives and liberals are guilty of talking out of their asses. Take off your blindfolds.

exactly...

Originally posted by hyper
Both conservatives and liberals are guilty of talking out of their asses. Take off your blindfolds.

You mean like Clinton did YESTERDAY at Rosa Parks funeral?

President Clinton, while addressing the attendees at Rosa Parks\' funeral yesterday, told of a time when he was 9 years old and learned of Rosa Parks\' infamous denial to sit on the back of the bus.

He stated that he was so moved by that, that he went and sat in the back of his school bus with the black children. (This was apparently supposed to be a show of alliance on his part).

But what is also apparent - is that it\'s not true!

In an article on Sep. 24, 1997 in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette it was noted that when he was 11 years old at the time of the famous integration of Little Rock\'s Central High School, President Clinton had attended SEGREGATED schools.

How could a child who attended segregated schools have ever been on a SCHOOL bus with black children?


http://www.ardemgaz.com/prev/central/wtranscript25.html

How bitter you are. Here\'s a sensible Tom Delay quote to cheer up your day.

"Guns have little or nothing to do with juvenile violence. The causes of youth violence are working parents who put their kids into daycare, the teaching of evolution in the schools, and working mothers who take birth control pills." –Tom DeLay, on causes of the Columbine High School massacre, 1999

I couldn\'t care less what Tom Delay says.  He is wrong on many issues.  Funny you can\'t admit Clinton is a habitual liar.  The media and the libs eat up every word he says.

The Democrats thrive on lies.  Not that the Republicans don\'t have their fair share of bold face liars as well - it is just the manner they do it.  WJC - the first "black" President... :rolleyes:

Oh? And why do you assume that I care about what Clinton says? Clinton is a habitual liar, just like any other politician. He is no hero to me, just as Tom DeLay is no hero to you.

Both parties thrive on lies, especially when they are in the minority. Again, take off your blindfolds.

Funny how you automatically label me a liberal and believe all liberals are flat out wrong. Perhaps it would do you good to stop envisioning the world as so black and white.

Here is the problem Hyper.  Liberals don\'t practice what they preach.  Ted Kennedy for instance wants to raise taxes on the rich, yet he has most of his money invested in trusts on the island of Fiji so he wouldn\'t have to pay these higher taxes!  Ted Kennedy has an estimated 500 million dollars and only pays approximately 135,000 dollars in taxes - unbelievable.   George Soros is another example of this as he wants to the inheritance tax in this country yet he has most of his assets protected off-shore.  Al Franken is all for affirmative action yet out of 112 employees he has only 1 minority on in his employment.

The only fault I really find with certain Republicans is the ties some have to far right Christian fundamentalists.  Clearly they do not practice what they preach either, but this on a whole does not effect me like what the Dems preach.  Tom Delay\'s problems have no direct influence on me as a citizen, but if certain Dems had their way they would want to tax me, yet they wouldn\'t give up a dime.

Do as I say (Not as I Do) Profiles in Liberal Hypocracy is a great book.

“I don’t own a single share of stock.” —Michael Moore

Members of the liberal left exude an air of moral certitude. They pride themselves on being selflessly committed to the highest ideals and seem particularly confident of the purity of their motives and the evil nature of their opponents. To correct economic and social injustice, liberals support a whole litany of policies and principles: progressive taxes, affirmative action, greater regulation of corporations, raising the inheritance tax, strict environmental regulations, children’s rights, consumer rights, and much, much more.

But do they actually live by these beliefs? Peter Schweizer decided to investigate in depth the private lives of some prominent liberals: politicians like the Clintons, Nancy Pelosi, the Kennedys, and Ralph Nader; commentators like Michael Moore, Al Franken, Noam Chomsky, and Cornel West; entertainers and philanthropists like Barbra Streisand and George Soros. Using everything from real estate transactions, IRS records, court depositions, and their own public statements, he sought to examine whether they really live by the principles they so confidently advocate.

What he found was a long list of glaring contradictions. Michael Moore denounces oil and defense contractors as war profiteers. He also claims to have no stock portfolio, yet he owns shares in Halliburton, Boeing, and Honeywell and does his postproduction film work in Canada to avoid paying union wages in the United States. Noam Chomsky opposes the very concept of private property and calls the Pentagon “the worst institution in human history,” yet he and his wife have made millions of dollars in contract work for the Department of Defense and own two luxurious homes. Barbra Streisand prides herself as an environmental activist, yet she owns shares in a notorious strip-mining company. Hillary Clinton supports the right of thirteen-year-old girls to have abortions without parental consent, yet she forbade thirteen-year-old Chelsea to pierce her ears and enrolled her in a school that would not distribute condoms to minors. Nancy Pelosi received the 2002 Cesar Chavez Award from the United Farm Workers, yet she and her husband own a Napa Valley vineyard that uses nonunion labor.

Schweizer’s conclusion is simple: liberalism in the end forces its adherents to become hypocrites. They adopt one pose in public, but when it comes to what matters most in their own lives—their property, their privacy, and their children—they jettison their liberal principles and embrace conservative ones. Schweizer thus exposes the contradiction at the core of liberalism: if these ideas don’t work for the very individuals who promote them, how can they work for the rest of us?

http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780385516952

Perhaps it would be good for you to see through the smoke and mirrors that the Dems put up and see them for what they really are.

[Jumpman]

Originally posted by GigaShadow

Perhaps it would be good for you see through the smoke and mirrors that the Dems put up and see them for what they really are.

[Evi]

That is the gayest pic ever.

Oh? And of course, the Republicans fervently stick to what they preach. They surely upheld states’ rights with Schiavo and Oregon’s Death with Dignity. I am sure Bush championed fiscal responsibility with the bridge to nowhere. No Republican who preaches about ethical purity would ever think about committing sexual harassment or stock fraud! And let’s not forget, banning abortion and supporting the death penalty at the same time makes perfect sense.

Hopefully you can find me a more objective source than a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. Must I really waste my time searching for you a liberal who only looks at the faults of the Republican Party?

I have already seen through the smoke and mirrors of the Democrats. You obviously have not chosen to see the destruction that your lumbering elephant often leaves behind.