Ok, but LIC\'s emphasizing this \'lie\' so much that it\'s almost become his (false) assumption that PS3 won\'t deliver on however Sony will market it. Everything is still a big \'what IF\'. Even Nintendo\'s Wii. Sure E3 showed us it looked fun, the concept sounds fun, but will most Wii games actually play fun !?
Marketing is always about \'promising\' things. Marketing guys play with margins and play with the mass\' feelings & non expertise. Just like how many consumers are a bit confused about High Definition TV. Every company does it.
People can fill up weeks fighting out \'word\' and technical semantics battles about what delivering a marketing promise is.
I mean... Miele... they create household electric / oven appliances... they never (afaik) made \'outrageous\' product promises yet i despise the performance of the products of theirs i experienced. I kind of dislike the Miele brand for that.
Sony supposedly said their PS2 would deliver \'Toy Story\' graphics. I don\'t even care for Toy Story graphics.
My expectations, like of many PS1 gamers ( I never had a PSX though. I had N64 ) was based on our own \'extrapolations\' of how games like Metal Gear Solid would look and play on PS2.
The whole ToyStory graphics things was indeed what it says ; a piece of marketing bluff about graphics.
Most gamers\' expectations encompassed way more than just the graphics argument ; they were thinking about PS2 gaming, not just graphics.
And PS2 delivered that and then some to the fans of such games.
* (technically speaking : PS2, for it\'s time, can push ALOT of polygons, maybe not textured or lit, but geometry wise it can do a ToyStory set + 1 or 2 characters yes) *