Originally posted by GigaShadow
I lived in Germany - but I must say the worst country other than France in Northern Europe is the Netherlands. There was some guy I knew there who was in his early 20\'s and collecting disability. The joke was he went to heavy metal concerts regularly and I couldn\'t see anything physically wrong with him. He could go party, but he couldn\'t work... yeah ok. So basically this guy was going to slack his entire life while the government picked up the tab.
Ok, well there are people like that everywhere, when I lived in the US I met a person like that, a drunk living on welfare (her kid was in my brothers class, she even came to school drunk several times), I reckon she was pretty capable of working.

I don’t know how it is in the Nederland’s, but here if you need welfare support they will be on you like a wolf to try and get you back to work as soon as possible.
Do socialists also subscribe to revisionist views on history? The reason I ask is because you haven\'t acknowledged that the forced sterilization in Sweden was due to the Swedish trying to create a balanced welfare state. The Washington Post is valid source, yet you deny that it had anything to do with welfare and the structure of Swedish society.
Revisionist, you mean like people who say the holocaust did not take place? Godness no, they do everything to remind us of what happened both in Germany and Soviet Union.. You can get a free book "Om detta må ni berätta" which is about the holocaust, I hope they will make a similar one about Stalin’s Soviet. They also had a Jewish man who was a prisoner in Auschwitz come to our school, he was one of the translators who took part in the Nuremberg trail, he lives here now and has written several books.
On the sterilization thing, I acknowledge it happened, its a well known fact that it was done to people with not wanted "racial" differences such as mental retards etc. I do however not trust where it says that it was done for keeping a balanced welfare system. If you read the quote they say they did not directly do it because of the welfare system, they
though they were contributing to the system. Also, there has been studies made on the matter, and none of them brings up anything about it being done for welfare.
Read the quote again.. what does it say?
"who
believed they were
helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state"
They believed, they thought.. Its very much iffy.
#1: The quote says they thought, believed.
#2: It is the only source that "tries" to state something like it.
#3: The website it comes off seems to have an agenda. :cool:
#4: Do not trust everything you read on the internet, even if he states it comes from a newspaper it CAN be made up (note: CAN be, Im not saying it is).
As I said before, I dont know why it was brought up, it happened a long time ago and the people know it happened, there have been countless of documentaries on the matter which have been aired on television.
If you want to bring up the past there are several other issues we are not so proud about, but of course they are not related to the social democrats, so you might not be interested.

Perhaps the 12 page American history book can reveal some “not so proud” moments?
