Originally posted by clips
ok..another example take the o.j. trail...do you beleive he did it? i\'m sure most white people believe he did it..but it has not been DOCUMENTED that he did it..so going by your logic you believe he didn\'t do it right?...yea you see where i\'m goin with this...
just because it\'s not documented you know damn well o.j. did or had something to do with it, whether it\'s been documented or not..so don\'t sit there and try to push that if it\'s not documented it\'s not a fact...which is not always the case...
The thing is there was proof that OJ did it - the knife, the DNA, etc... now you are using a trial which has so many variables as your defense. You know as well I, that the prosecution blew the OJ case - just like the prosecution for the Scott Peterson case will drop the ball. Sometimes guilty people go free.
The fact is I have never heard that Guillani was a racist. Sure people didn\'t like him, but once again he isn\'t even remotely like Al Sharpton. Honestly, I can\'t see why anyone would defend the man - you are acting like he is MLK!
Sharpton also has close ties with the Nation of Islam - another racist organization. I really am growing weary of trying to show you how the majority of people in this country view him. Yesterday, I asked a friend here at work what she thought of Sharpton - her response was nothing but laughter and she is black.