Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: X-Box X-ageratted?  (Read 7029 times)

Offline Dwarrior
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #90 on: December 31, 2000, 05:04:40 PM »
I havent seen Microsoft post 300 million in realtime with textures.  Y\'all are just being silly now because you can\'t find anything to fight about.

  Is it me or do PS2 fans want to fight about who really is superior and who really has the hype.  Everyone knows that Sony lied so this is no problem.

  You really know when something is really inferior because their users want to fight and nitpick all the time. Hense this thread, you would think the PS2 fans would be playing the PS2 instead of wasting their time on this thread, but as you can see its not enough. :)

Jumpman
  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #91 on: December 31, 2000, 05:06:23 PM »
Sup Docwiz?:D

Offline Regent Weber
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.yahoo.com
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #92 on: December 31, 2000, 05:44:36 PM »
Yeah ****Wiz, but at least were not like some lowlife forum troll whose only purpose is to spread lies and half-truths in the hopes of reinforcing their pathetic low self-esteem complexes, because our console is actually HERE instead of still being in the PAPER stage of development.
\"What in the hell is this..?\"

\"Oh, just the digital equivalent ot the Hydrogen Bomb..\"

  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #93 on: December 31, 2000, 11:28:30 PM »
Screw all this tech talk, I\'m getting sick of people saying that Microsoft is lying about xbox\'s specs.  This post is pathetic.

No one really cares about poly counts. Its the games that people care about. 2001 is when PS2 gets its first round of heavy hitters. MGS2, ZOE, Silent Hill 2, Onmuisha, Final Fantasy X, and many more. These games will either make or break the PS2. You\'ve better hope that these games are better than the launch ones( I hope so too !!!) or PS2 is sunk (in Japan at least).

Offline §ôµÏG®ïñD

  • ñµñ©Håkµ må§tË®
  • Global Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9682
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • Ǧµî✟å® Ĵµñķîë
    • §ôµÏG®ïñD'§ Electrical / Electronics shit.
  • PSN ID: SoulGrind81
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #94 on: January 01, 2001, 12:30:53 AM »
Both developers (ms and sony) Hyped up there consoles. FACT.. Like it or not. They did. get over it. Xbox fans say the PS2 was a lie.. Yet they CAN NOT Admit that the XBOX too had lies told about it.. "but MS fixed there Mistake" they say, haha yea then Sony did the same thing.. Come on. Both systems have hype, Simple.
  Ǧµî✟å® Ĵµñķîë!!  

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #95 on: January 01, 2001, 12:37:00 AM »
Amen to that.
I\'ve been saying it for I don\'t know how long.
:)

Offline §ôµÏG®ïñD

  • ñµñ©Håkµ må§tË®
  • Global Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9682
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • Ǧµî✟å® Ĵµñķîë
    • §ôµÏG®ïñD'§ Electrical / Electronics shit.
  • PSN ID: SoulGrind81
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #96 on: January 01, 2001, 12:55:03 AM »
For those whom doesn\'t understand what HYPE means.



Both MS and sony said things too hypen there systems. Too make people believe they were something they are not. That is hype.
  Ǧµî✟å® Ĵµñķîë!!  

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #97 on: January 01, 2001, 01:01:06 AM »
:laughing:
Nice,Nathan.

 

Offline Samwise
  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12129
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://151.200.3.8/~vze29k6v/you.html
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #98 on: January 01, 2001, 03:09:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dwarrior
I havent seen Microsoft post 300 million in realtime with textures.  Y\'all are just being silly now because you can\'t find anything to fight about.

Can\'t find anything \'to fight about\'? :laughing:

Why don\'t you comment on GC-PS2-DC-XB\'s good post about the Xbox\' real performance? I\'m sure a smart fella like you could easily prove him wrong. After all, it was you who claimed 100 million polygons with all effects on. :rolleyes:

Come on Dwarrior, don\'t kid yerself. Xbox is powerful, but not as powerful as many people once thought. MS hypes. Sony hypes. MS \'lies\'. Sony \'lied\'. Just admit it, instead of using the argument of "but Sony lied too, so ha!". So if someone steals it\'s ok for you to do the same? Geeze man.

I think the GC has a good shot of competing with Xbox graphics wise. We\'ll see some amazing games on both systems, so don\'t even try and call me a biased fanboy. I know Xbox and GC are the most powerful consoles (they\'d better be after coming out 1-2 years after PS2).
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAPETIME!
(thanks Chizzy!)

  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #99 on: January 01, 2001, 12:24:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Samwise
[BWhy don\'t you comment on GC-PS2-DC-XB\'s good post about the Xbox\' real performance? I\'m sure a smart fella like you could easily prove him wrong. After all, it was you who claimed 100 million polygons with all effects on. :rolleyes:

[/B]


He wish he could prove me wrong. It\'s only fanboys like him that go around spreading/believing false information.
he already knows these things, but nooooooo, he wants X-box to be out putting figures like 60 mil+, even with 8 lights, and 4 textures. He could only be an ass!

You all heard it, and you heard it with facts, X-BOX IS CAPABLE OF AROUND 10 MILLION P/SEC WITH ABSOLUTELY ALL "IT\'S EFFECTS"!(and that\'s making things slightly more than they are) SO DON\'T LET ANY X-BOX FANBOY SET YOU WRONG!

The thing is, that number is astonishing enough, considering how much fancy effects and features(lights and textures) it can put out. WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU WANT TO INFLATE THAT NUMBER?

Then to make things worst, he comes to forums with such insignificant infromation, about this and that. Most other can\'t understand a word he saids, or don\'t have back up links, so they can\'t argue with him.

But I know that fool, Dwarrior/Docwiz, and he know he can\'t play that sh*t with me. All fanboys know when they see facts, that they must shut ta hell up!

  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #100 on: January 01, 2001, 12:44:05 PM »
Some of u r so weird. 300 mpps is the number the xbox can do WITHOUT any effects, it is a pointless number. 125 mpps is how much the Xbox can do with 2 effects, also a pointless number. Next the specs were not lowered but they were finalised, they can grow again though. (The problem was they couldn\'t get micron size small enough to support 300 mhz. If they can lower the micron size it will be 300 mhz again.) Next u say the Xbox won\'t be able to do more then 15 mpps with effects. THATS BS. The Geforce 2 can do 19mpps so don\'t u think a card thats 2 generations ahead of the geforce 2 can do ATLEAST 19 mpps.

  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #101 on: January 01, 2001, 01:06:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raven
Some of u r so weird. 300 mpps is the number the xbox can do WITHOUT any effects, it is a pointless number. 125 mpps is how much the Xbox can do with 2 effects, also a pointless number. Next the specs were not lowered but they were finalised, they can grow again though. (The problem was they couldn\'t get micron size small enough to support 300 mhz. If they can lower the micron size it will be 300 mhz again.) Next u say the Xbox won\'t be able to do more then 15 mpps with effects. THATS BS. The Geforce 2 can do 19mpps so don\'t u think a card thats 2 generations ahead of the geforce 2 can do ATLEAST 19 mpps.


One would think, that I made it clear enough.

Obviously, you don\'t know much about graphics and how they work, do you?

I bet you don\'t, cause just like everyone else, you are looking at numbers alone, so you know that PS2 can do 20 mill polys with all effects, therefore it sounds like BS if someone says X-box(which is obviously more powerful than PS2) can do below 15 mil with all effects. In that case it makes no sense to even try to explain to you.

But just let me say, "all effects" on PS2, is not the same as "all effects" on X-box. Maybe a little logic can take you an inch further, but that\'s all I\'ll say.

It seems that MS and even fanboys brainwash you guy so well, that the truth/facts is now bullSh*t

geeez!

PS: Did you even read that quote I put up a few posts back?
Probably not!


  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #102 on: January 01, 2001, 02:15:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GC-PS2-DC-XB
Quote
Originally posted by Raven
Some of u r so weird. 300 mpps is the number the xbox can do WITHOUT any effects, it is a pointless number. 125 mpps is how much the Xbox can do with 2 effects, also a pointless number. Next the specs were not lowered but they were finalised, they can grow again though. (The problem was they couldn\'t get micron size small enough to support 300 mhz. If they can lower the micron size it will be 300 mhz again.) Next u say the Xbox won\'t be able to do more then 15 mpps with effects. THATS BS. The Geforce 2 can do 19mpps so don\'t u think a card thats 2 generations ahead of the geforce 2 can do ATLEAST 19 mpps.


One would think, that I made it clear enough.

Obviously, you don\'t know much about graphics and how they work, do you?

I bet you don\'t, cause just like everyone else, you are looking at numbers alone, so you know that PS2 can do 20 mill polys with all effects, therefore it sounds like BS if someone says X-box(which is obviously more powerful than PS2) can do below 15 mil with all effects. In that case it makes no sense to even try to explain to you.

But just let me say, "all effects" on PS2, is not the same as "all effects" on X-box. Maybe a little logic can take you an inch further, but that\'s all I\'ll say.

It seems that MS and even fanboys brainwash you guy so well, that the truth/facts is now bullSh*t

geeez!

PS: Did you even read that quote I put up a few posts back?
Probably not!

 [/B]


No i didn\'t read it. Must have missed it. BUT I KNOW THAT XBOX HAS MORE EFFECTS THEN A PS2!!! I\'m not an idiot.

  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #103 on: January 04, 2001, 12:28:53 AM »
Hmm.... guess Micro$oft is wasting their money on campaigning then. With GC-PS2-DC-XB around to back M$ up, who needs $500 mil on campaigning :D

  • Guest
X-Box X-ageratted?
« Reply #104 on: January 04, 2001, 11:51:18 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by shadowflare
Hmm.... guess Micro$oft is wasting their money on campaigning then. With GC-PS2-DC-XB around to back M$ up, who needs $500 mil on campaigning :D
 


Back MS Up?...How so?
Maybe you can\'t read too well....

anyway, in case you missed it(which you probably did)
I\'m stating to these MS fanboys, that X-box total max polygon number with absolutely all effects and features, is below 15 mil p/sec, not 100 mil.

At the same time I stating that YOU Sony fanboys(and even X-box fanboys) shouldn\'t get the wrong idea about that number, cause that number is with X-box pushing a load of effects, 4 times the texture layers, and 8 times the HW lights as PS2.

No one is being defending actually. Just bringing all you fools back to reality.

I quess your statements proves you\'re a true Sony fanboy.

Yeah, you gotta be one!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk