Originally posted by Rikku
I have you on my ignore list but I thought I\'d see what you said about this. As for the sheep comment, it was meant to hit a certain frame of mind. I say the same thing to Xbots.
I just don\'t understand why it\'s not enough to have a powerful next-gen system, but instead you have to have the most powerful? *shrugs
Did I say most?I didnt even mention Revolution
I don\'t understand that, you\'ll still get a next-gen PS3 and updates on all their IP\'s. That of itself is exciting to me, and the idea of a next-gen Jak & Daxter...that makes me touch myself, Evi.
[/B]
Bah.Thats not the point.
When XBOX360 is released before PS3 developers will start supporting XBOX360.It will gain consumers, support.A good thing.
The bad thing about PS3:
If when PS3 is launched later is nothing but an XBOX360 with its name changed when it comes to power and with less games since XBOX360 has been around earlier(which means more consumers=developers motivated to develop for the console with the most consumers) the consumer wont expect that he can get as much as what XBOX360 will be offering by then.
1st party sequels alone cant make the difference.We want brand new titles.Which XBOX360 will be having more when the "as powerful PS3" is released.
I am expecting Sony\'s PS3 to be more powerful since it will be released earlier.Unless its released in the same time frame as XBOX360.Only then I wouldnt mind as much.
But then again even then I might mind.Because so far I havent been impressed as much as I ve been expecting and I want my expectations to be satisfied